There has been talk of banning Pit bull dogs here in Ontario which just seems damned silly to me. If you own a dog ANY DOG that attacks a person then you are responsible for that. It seems to me that too many people want to blame a breed of dog and not the irresponsible owners. It would get very very complicated in a breed specific ban, I mean how do you decide what the dog's breed is and WHO makes that decision? The owner, a vet, the humane society or the police? Pit bulls are terriers so do you ban all terriers? I heard one newscaster actually say that terriers are "ticking timebombs". Please. Toto is a terrier cross with gawd knows what and she is knee high - does that make her a ticking timebomb? YORKIES are terriers, are they dangerous too? The most irritating part of this is that there are no actual numbers on dog bites/attacks in Ontario. One study done in Toronto involving 6 hospitals reported 1040 (approx.) dog bites that required stitches in 2004 - of those only 12 were bites by pitbulls. Everyone seems to KNOW that they are vicious well because it's on the news, what they don't seem to realize is that right now pitbulls are the "sexy" breed to shine the spotlight on. When I was a kid dobermans were the dog to be feared, then rottwielers when I was a teenager - my mother tells me it was german shepherds (or alsatians as she calls them). There is this knee-jerk reaction to every report of a pitbull bite whereas golden retreivers just don't get the press and they bite people far more often (if the dog trainer I just saw on tv is right). One city here in Ontario (Kitchener/Waterloo) created a pitbull ban last year - to them it meant absolutely no pitbulls within the city limits and surprise surprise their number of pitbull bites went down. Well, duh, if there are no pitbulls within city limits it's hardly surprising that they didn't bite anyone within city limits. Funnily enough, K/W doesn't have any numbers on the number of dog bites within the city after the ban and which breeds caused those bites. I don't think that a breed ban is the answer, I think making people responsible for their dogs IS. I'm a dog owner and I like to think I'm a responsible owner. I don't own a pit bull - not because I'm afraid it's a "ticking timebomb" but because I know that it's too much dog for me - I know that a small dog is just right for my level of dog savvy. My brother on the other hand owns an English Bull Mastiff and Rosie is a huuuuggggggeeeeee dog (a la the AC/DC song). Scott is the right person for that kind of dog, he KNOWS his dog and has control of her at all times but there are so many people out there getting these huge dogs and then find they can't control them.
Then I found this . Poor cat there was obviously seriously wrong and all they had to do was throw a blanket over it and take it to a vet. I suppose they'll be trying to ban orange tabbies next
7 years ago